Harm Reduction: A Concept Analysis
Main Article Content
Over the last 25 years, harm reduction has shifted to focus on public health and addressing the opioid crisis. Nurses working in addictions treatment utilize the principles of harm reduction to improve the health of clients.
Concept clarity assists healthcare providers to understand the applications and attributes of a concept. Method
A concept analysis of harm reduction using the Rodgers (1989) method of evolutionary analysis was un-dertaken. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using CINAHL Plus and Social Work Abstracts.
The key attributes of harm reduction include safety, supplies, education, partnerships, and policy. Applications of harm reduction include needle exchange programs, supervised consumption sites, medication-assisted treatment, and increased access to take-home naloxone kits. The main antecedent to harm reduction is the presence of harm. Consequences explored include safer injection practices, decreased transmission of blood-borne illnesses, improved client relationships, and decreased overdose-related deaths. Stigma, health promotion, and pragmatism are the related concepts discussed. A model case is provided.
The principles of harm reduction are becoming increasingly popular as an inclusive and evidence-based nursing approach to addictions treatment and management. As using substances continues to shift and in-crease, harm reduction strategies must remain malleable and available in both the community and hospital settings to address the issue and decrease the associated healthcare costs. Future implications for nursing practice and research are provided.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles published in all DPG titles is retained by the author(s). The author(s) grants DPG the rights to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. The author grants DPG exclusive commercial rights to the article. The author grants any party the rights to use the article freely for non-commercial purposes provided that the original work is properly cited under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
2. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Opioid-related harms in Canada Ottawa: Author; 2019. https://www .cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/opioid-related-harms-report-2018-en-web.pdf
3. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse and Addiction. Hospital costs and impacts of substance use. Ottawa: Author; 2018. www.ccdus.ca/Eng/topics/Costs-of-Substance-Abuse-in-Canada/Hospital-Costs-Impacts-of-Substance-Use/Pages/default.aspx
4. Canadian Nurses Association. Harm reduction and substance use. Ottawa: Author; 2019. https://www. cna-aiic.ca/-/media/cna/page-content/pdf-en/joint_posi-tion_statement_harm_reduction_and_substance_use.pdf
5. Ball AL. HIV, injecting drug use and harm reduction: a public health response. Addiction 2007;102(5): 684–90.
6. Kulikowski J, Linder E. Making the case for harm reduction programs for injection drug users. Nurs 2018;48(6):46–51. doi:10.1097/01.NURSE.0000532745.80506.17
7. Rodgers BL. Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. J of Advanced Nurs 1989;14(4):330–5. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989. tb03420.x
8. Morin KA, Eibl JK, Franklyn AM, et al. The opioid crisis: past, present and future policy climate in Ontario, Canada. Substance Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2017;12:1–7. doi:10.1186/s13011-017-0130-5
9. Bradbury-Jones C, Sambrook S, Irvine F. Power and empowerment in nursing: a fourth theoretical approach. J Advanced Nurs 2008;62(2):258–66. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04598.x
10. van Boekel LC, Brouwers EPM, van Weeghel J, et al. Stigma among health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders and its consequences for healthcare delivery: Systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;131(1/2):23–35. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2013.02.018
11. Manias E, Street A. Possibilities for critical social theory and Foucault’s work: a toolbox approach. Nurs Inquiry 2000;7(1):50–60.
12. Kennedy-Hendricks A, Barry CL, Gollust SE, et al. Social stigma toward persons with prescription opioid use disorder: associations with public support for puni-tive and public health-oriented policies. Psychiatr Ser 2017;68(5):462–9. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201600056
13. Sumner J. The nurse in the caring in nurse relationship: a critical social theory perspective. Int J Human Caring 2004;8(1):37–45.
14. Ford R. An analysis of nurses’ views of harm reduc-tion measures and other treatments for the problems associated with illicit drug use. Australian J of Adv Nurs 2010;28(1):14–24.
15. Estreet A, Archibald P, Tirmazi MT, et al. Exploring social work student education: The effect of a harm reduction curriculum on student knowledge and atti-tudes regarding opioid use disorders. Substance Abuse 2017;38(4):369–75. doi:10.1080/08897077.2017.1341447
16. James K, Samuels I, Moran P, et al. Harm reduction as a strategy for supporting people who self-harm on mental health wards: the views and experiences of prac-titioners. J Affect Dis 2017;214:67–73. doi:10.1016/j. jad.2017.03.002
17. McKeganey N. From harm reduction to drug user abstinence: a journey in drug treatment policy. J Sub-stance Use 2011;16(3):179–94. doi:10.3109/1465989 1.2011.580228
18. Barker KL, Galeota EY. Shining a LIGHT Into Drug Darkness. J Nurse Practitioners 2018;14(6):463–9. doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.12.004
19. Bowles JM, Lankenau SE. “I gotta go with modern technology, so I’m gonna give ‘em the narcan”: the diffusion of innovations and an opioid overdose pre-vention program. Qual Health Res 2019;29(3):345–56. doi:10.1177/1049732318800289
20. Bozinoff N, Small W, Long C, et al. Still “at risk”: an examination of how street-involved young people under-stand, experience, and engage with “harm reduction” in Vancouver’s inner city. Int J Drug Policy 2017;45:33–9. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.006
21. McDonald R, Campbell ND, Strang J. Twenty years of take-home naloxone for the prevention of overdose deaths from heroin and other opioids - conception and maturation. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017;178:176–87. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.001
22. Deren S, Naegle M, Hagan H, et al. Continuing links between substance use and HIV highlight the impor-tance of nursing roles. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2017;28(4):622–32. doi:10.1016/j.jana.2017.03.005
23. Hilton BA, Thompson R, Moore-Dempsey L et al. Urban outpost nursing: the nature of the nurses’ work in the AIDS Prevention Street Nurse Program. Public Health Nurs 2001;18(4):273–80.
24. Kerr T, Small W, Buchner C, et al. Syringe sharing and HIV incidence among injection drug users and increased access to sterile syringes. Am J Pub Health 2010;100(8):1449–53. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.178467
25. Kerr T, Tyndall MW, Lai C, et al. Drug-related overdoses within a medically supervised safer injection facility. Int J Drug Policy 2006;17(5):436–41.
26. Wallace B, Barber K, Pauly B. Sheltering risks: Imple-mentation of harm reduction in homeless shelters during an overdose emergency. Int J Drug Policy 2018;83–9. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.011
27. Eversman M. Harm reduction practices in outpa-tient drug-free substance abuse settings. J Subst Use 2012;17(2):150–62. doi:10.3109/14659891.2010.540295
28. Goodyear K, Haass-Koffler CL, Chavanne D. Opioid use and stigma: The role of gender, language and precipitat-ing events. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018;185:339–46. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.037
29. Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, et al. Methadone main-tenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:1-34. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002209
30. Health Canada. Harm Reduction: Canadian Drugs and Substances Strategy. Ottawa: Author; 2019. https://www. canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/substance-use/ canadian-drugs-substances-strategy/harm-reduction. html#a
31. Fischer B, Rehm J, Tyndall M. Effective Canadian policy to reduce harms from prescription opioids: learning from past failures. Can Med Assoc J 2016;188(17–18):1240–4. doi:10.1503/cmaj.160356
32. Health Canada. About the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act. Ottawa: Author; 2019. Available at: https://www .canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/substance-use/ problematic-prescription-drug-use/opioids/about-good -samaritan-drug-overdose-act.html
33. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Canadian re-search initiative in substance misuse (CRISM) Ottawa:Author; 2019. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc. gc.ca/e/44597.html
34. Pauly BB, Reist D, Belle-Isle L, et al. Housing and harm reduction: What is the role of harm reduction in address-ing homelessness? Int J Drug Policy 2013;24(4):284–90. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.03.008
35. Fagerström KO, Bridgman K. Tobacco harm reduction: The need for new products that can compete with ciga-rettes. Addict Behav 2014;39(3):507–11. doi:10.1016/j. addbeh.2013.11.002
36. Souleymanov R, Allman D. Articulating connec-tions between the harm-reduction paradigm and the marginalisation of people who use illicit drugs. Br J Social Work 2016;46(5):1429–45. doi:10.1093/bjsw/ bcv067
37. Aceijas C. The ethics in substitution treatment and harm reduction. an analytical review. Pub Health Rev 2012;34(1):1–12. doi:10.1007/BF03391668
38. Timko C, Schultz NR, Cucciare MA, et al. Retention in medication-assisted treatment for opiate dependence: A systematic review. J Addict Dis 2016;35(1):22–35. doi:10.1080/10550887.2016.1100960
39. Merriam-Webster. Definition of PRAGMATISM. Author: 2019. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/ dictionary/pragmatism
40. Metrebian N, Groshkova T, Hellier J, et al. Drug use, health and social outcomes of hard-to-treat heroin addicts receiving supervised injectable opiate treat-ment: secondary outcomes from the Randomized Injectable Opioid Treatment Trial (RIOTT). Addiction 2015;110(3):479–90. doi:10.1111/add.12748
41. BC Centre on Substance Use. Guidance for inject-able opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder. Vancouver: Author; 2019. Available at: http://www. bccsu.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/BC-iOAT-Guidelines-10.2017.pdf
42. Palis H, Marchand K, Guh D, et al. Men’s and women’s response to treatment and perceptions of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of injectable opioid as-sisted treatment for severe opioid use disorder. Subst Abuse Treat Prevent Policy 2017;12:1–12. doi:10.1186/ s13011-017-0110-9
43. Bell J, Belackova V, Lintzeris N. Supervised inject-able opioid treatment for the management of opioid dependence. Drugs 2018;78(13):1339–52. doi:10.1007/ s40265-018-0962-y
44. Ross, C. A., Goldner, E. M. Stigma, negative attitudes and discrimination towards mental illness within the nursing profession: A review of the literature. J Psy-chiatr Mental Health Nursing 2009;16(6):558–567. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01399.x
45. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. My son no longer has a voice: Overdose victims’ relatives urge UCP to fund more consumption sites. (2019, June 7). Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/
46. Bell D. (2019, July 17). Deleted tweet about big pharma by associate minister for addictions ‘laughably absurd,’ says scientist. Canadian Broadcast Corporation. Re-trieved from https://www.cbc.ca/
47. Cannon E. How to address methamphetamine abuse in the United States: nurses leading comprehensive care. MEDSURG Nurs 2018;27(2):103–7.
48. Gray A. Advanced or advancing nursing practice: what is the future direction for nursing? British J of Nurs 2016;25(1):8–13. doi:10.12968/bjon.2016.25.1.8